Jennie Ruby Album Review Sparks Controversy Over BLACKPINK Members Comparison
The K-pop world is buzzing with controversy after a recent review of BLACKPINK Jennie’s “Ruby” album has drawn criticism for its apparent negativity toward other BLACKPINK members. The review, published by music outlet Pitchfork, has left many fans and netizens questioning the fairness of music criticism when it comes to comparing members of the same group.
Pitchfork, a well-known music review platform, recently published their take on Jennie’s debut solo album “Ruby.” The review awarded Jennie’s work a score of 7.1, which netizens quickly noted is the highest score given to any K-pop artist on the site. While the achievement itself is impressive, what caught fans’ attention wasn’t just the high score but the controversial comparisons made between Jennie and her fellow BLACKPINK members.
The Jennie Ruby album review controversy has sparked heated discussions across social media platforms, with many BLACKPINK fans expressing their disappointment over what they perceive as unnecessary criticism of Lisa, Rosé, and Jisoo. The situation has highlighted the sensitive nature of comparing members within the same group, especially when one is praised at the expense of others.
See Also: Red Velvet’s Yeri Shares Emotional Tribute To Late Friend Kim Sae Ron
Previous Criticism of Lisa’s “Alter Ego” Album
Before reviewing Jennie’s album, the same outlet and writer had previously published what many netizens described as a “brutal” review of Lisa’s “Alter Ego” album. The stark contrast between the two reviews has raised eyebrows within the BLACKPINK fandom, commonly known as BLINKS.
The Jennie Ruby album review controversy gained further traction when fans noticed the significant difference in tone and scoring between the two reviews. While Lisa’s album received harsh criticism, Jennie’s work was praised extensively, creating what many perceive as an unfair comparison between the two talented artists.
Many have pointed out that the same reviewer handled both albums, which has led to questions about consistency and potential bias in music criticism. The situation has created a divide among fans, with some defending the reviewer’s right to their opinion while others condemn what they see as unnecessary negativity toward certain BLACKPINK members.
Controversial Comparisons in the Review
What truly ignited the Jennie Ruby album review controversy were the direct comparisons made between Jennie and the other BLACKPINK members. The review contained several statements that many netizens found disrespectful and unnecessary.
In the article, the author made claims that seemed to diminish the artistic value of the other members’ solo works. The review stated that “Rosé’s rosie lacked interiority and LISA’s Alter Ego whiffed its titular premise. Jisoo’s Amortage fared better, but only because it embraced anonymity.” These statements were followed by the controversial claim that “If JENNIE has the most robust individual musical identity of the quartet, it’s because her songs have a crucial element the others’ lack: They sound good.”
This particular comparison struck a nerve with many fans who believe that each BLACKPINK member brings unique talents and artistic vision to their solo projects. The review also made broader claims about BLACKPINK’s career trajectory, suggesting that “Success changed BLACKPINK forever, for better and worse” and that the group had shifted toward “making diluted songs that felt ready-made for Kidz Bop.”
Final Thoughts on the Jennie Ruby Album Review Controversy
The controversy surrounding Jennie’s “Ruby” album review highlights the complex relationship between music criticism, fan culture, and artist comparisons. While Jennie’s achievement of receiving a high score should be celebrated, many fans believe it shouldn’t come at the cost of diminishing other BLACKPINK members’ artistic efforts.
The situation has sparked important conversations about how music critics approach reviewing artists from the same group. Many have emphasized that it’s possible to praise one artist’s work without necessarily criticizing others, especially when those artists are part of the same team.
As the discussion continues across various platforms including Reddit forums, the Jennie Ruby album review controversy serves as a reminder of the passionate nature of K-pop fandoms and their protective stance toward all members of their favorite groups. What do you think about this situation? Is it fair to compare members of the same group in reviews, or should each artist’s work be evaluated independently on its own merits?